He supports phased rollouts but rejects the current extralegal process.
Staggered AI rollout is not inherently bad. Giving reputable defenders a chance to use powerful models to increase security is good if done predictably, consistently, and transparently.
The problem is the capricious, closed door, extralegal way the White House is doing this.
No entity, including the White House, should have such capricious power over AI.
Users in the replies criticize the White House's control over AI rollouts as opaque and motivated by officials seeking influence and profit.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
@ramez
@ramez @mattparlmer They love having the influence and the potential to profit from it. Same thing they did with tariffs.
Staggered AI rollout is not inherently bad. Giving reputable defenders a chance to use powerful models to increase security is good if done predictably, consistently, and transparently.
The problem is the capricious, closed door, extralegal way the White House is doing this.
No entity, including the White House, should have such capricious power over AI.
@ramez Well, it's nothing new for the White House. They do everything in such a transparent way, don't they?
