David Sacks accuses OpenAI and Anthropic of seeking regulatory capture

I totally agree w David that America needs a thriving open source ecosystem & robust competition between open source & closed frontier labs to keep America in the lead. Reg capture is bad in all forms. The frontier labs - like Apple - will thrive even w great open… Show more

OPEN. Agree with @DavidSacks and he was in a position to witness first hand the intent of the CLOSED LABS. “the leading closed labs, already a duopoly in terms of AI model revenue, want the government to eliminate their open source competition. They have laid their cards on the… Show more

Good points from David. Regarding "grounded in facts, logic, and evidence, not the deliberate exploitation of fear and uncertainty," the exact same point could be made about large swaths of the media and certain financial writers. Y'all know who I'm talking about. --… Show more

For the current AI technology, there is no duopoly, as China was forced to take the open-source position, thanks to the genius fear-mongering strategy taken bythe US duo. As for true intelligence, it has yet to be implemented technologically, but Nature has already democratised… Show more

“The leading closed labs, already a duopoly in terms of AI model revenue, want the government to eliminate their open source competition.” Gotta say I agree with @DavidSacks. https://twitter.com/davidsacks/status/2078826291638522127

David Sacks calls Anthropic and OpenAI a duopoly, and says they want to use the government to eliminate their open source competition. https://twitter.com/DavidSacks/status/2078826291638522127