The original Mythos model was withheld over safety risks
Glad Anthropic released Mythos/Fable! Seems like a great model - congratulations!
I think preserving models for internal deployment is risky. I encourage Anthropic to release Mythos, even if it’s a version that over refuses on cyber tasks or routes risky responses to a weaker model, as we did with codex.
Mythos / Fable launch reminds me of strawberry / o1 launch.
Hype mostly justified but clearly serving a controlled narrative
Cybersecurity / safety implications beyond what the existing safeguards were designed to handle
The feeling of it's so over for everyone else, and yet proof of existence is all it takes for the most resourceful among us
AGI but only if u wanna work on automating b2b saas 😔
shade aside this is a very nice proof of concept from ant that technical safeguards can hopefully be created and relied on against other domains (autonomous weapons, surveillance, etc all that stuff)
damn, i thought i was at the frontier until fable started agreeing to help with my project 😪😓
@philhchen that's why it's called fable / myth
@boazbaraktcs 5.6 ain't competing with fable 5 from what I tested in the design arena. Any chance of a comeback?
The original Mythos model was withheld over safety risks
Glad Anthropic released Mythos/Fable! Seems like a great model - congratulations!
I think preserving models for internal deployment is risky. I encourage Anthropic to release Mythos, even if it’s a version that over refuses on cyber tasks or routes risky responses to a weaker model, as we did with codex.