ScienceBrute force versus original insight in a claimed AI solution to Navier–Stokes
A user argues that brute-force problem-solving falls short of Einstein-level insight, and proposes reconciling quantum theory with general relativity as a test for artificial general intelligence.
TLDR
A user characterizes a claimed AI solution to the Navier–Stokes equation as brute force rather than original insight. They expect cheaper computing to make more brute-force problems solvable, but distinguish that progress from theoretical breakthroughs like Einstein’s reframing of gravity. Their proposed test for artificial general intelligence (AGI) is reconciling quantum theory with general relativity. Writing in September 2026, they predict AI will not pass that test in the next five years, and probably for much longer.
Combined views
31.5K
1 Source, first seen 10d ago
Brute force versus original insight in a claimed AI solution to Navier–Stokes
A user argues that brute-force problem-solving falls short of Einstein-level insight, and proposes reconciling quantum theory with general relativity as a test for artificial general intelligence.