A critique of linking both “lots of hurricanes” and “no hurricanes” to climate change
One post argues that climate change gets blamed whether hurricanes are plentiful or absent, calling that framing “intellectually lazy.”
TLDR
A post mocks the reasoning “Lots of hurricanes = climate change” and “No hurricanes = also climate change.” It characterizes this as “finger-pointing” and calls it “intellectually lazy.”
Combined views
22.3K
1 Source, first seen 9d ago
A critique of linking both “lots of hurricanes” and “no hurricanes” to climate change
One post argues that climate change gets blamed whether hurricanes are plentiful or absent, calling that framing “intellectually lazy.”
TLDR
A post mocks the reasoning “Lots of hurricanes = climate change” and “No hurricanes = also climate change.” It characterizes this as “finger-pointing” and calls it “intellectually lazy.”