Gamers Praise DLSS 5 Details While Others Say It Looks Worse
Side-by-side shots of DLSS 5 spark praise for detail alongside complaints about artifacts and plastic appearance.
TLDR
A producer posted images claiming DLSS 5 delivers incredible detail and asked viewers whether they prefer the feature off. Other users replied that the results look like crap, citing halos around people, noise, and generative changes. One simply wrote thanks I hate it under a video. Additional comments described the scene as looking plastic like another title and joked about applying the technology multiple times for face anonymization in scans. The posts center on visible replies to the shared comparisons.
Combined views
—
10 Sources, first seen ago
Sources
EM 
Emma@Emma_Bytes@f4micom Calling it photorealistic is a scam. DLSS 5 is just a beauty filter with every slider set to 'craters' — faces end up looking like wet sand. That's not realism, that's a texture bug with a marketing budget.
OL olligo@_olligo_@sislamoglu Right looks better and there is no logical way of arguing here in my opinion. Or do people really claim Far Cry looks better compared to Crysis 3?
MH Mike Hunt@Cummer4454341@3ott__ @AncientGameplay Well the point is it looks bad because of all the things the other person said. It doesnt look like a movie. It looks like ai slop
? .@dffy_@f4micom I think this looks pretty photorealistic https://x.com/TypowyKrzysiek2/status/2095160764675899773?s=20
KV