Alternatives To Wood Crating and Packaging
Looking for something a little bit different ? There are so many materials out there to use lets go over some of the great alternatives we tend to use quite often and lets see how well they work out.
Wood packaging materials like pallets, crates, and dunnage have long been staples in international shipping due to their strength and affordability. However, as discussed in the challenges posed by pests and the requirements of ISPM 15 (the International Standard for Phytosanitary Measures No. 15), many shippers are turning to alternatives. These options help avoid pest-related disruptions, eliminate the need for heat treatment or fumigation, reduce weight for lower shipping costs, improve hygiene, and often enhance sustainability.
Alternatives fall into two main categories: exempt materials under ISPM 15 (no additional phytosanitary treatment required) and fully non-wood options. Below, we explore the most common and effective alternatives, their benefits, drawbacks, and suitability for international trade.
1. Engineered/Processed Wood Products (ISPM 15 Exempt)These materials are manufactured using heat, pressure, and adhesives, rendering them pest-free without further treatment. They are widely accepted for international shipping and often serve as direct substitutes for solid raw wood.
Plywood — Strong, lightweight panels commonly used for crate sides or full structures.
Oriented Strand Board (OSB) — Made from compressed wood strands; durable and cost-effective.
Particleboard, Fiberboard, Hardboard, or MDF — Similar engineered composites.
Presswood (Molded Wood) — Formed from recycled wood fibers or sawdust under high heat and pressure (e.g., INKA-style pallets).
Pros:
Exempt from ISPM 15 treatment and marking.
Often lighter than solid wood, reducing freight costs.
Good strength for many loads; recyclable in many cases.
Widely available and customizable.
Cons:
May not match solid wood's load-bearing capacity for extremely heavy items.
Still wood-based, so not fully eliminating environmental or pest concerns.
These are popular for export crating where full wood-free isn't necessary.
2. Corrugated Cardboard / Paper-Based Pallets and Crates
Heavy-duty corrugated or honeycomb cardboard structures (e.g., HexcelCrate, Rhino Pallet, or PALLITE® systems) are increasingly used for pallets, crates, and protective packaging.
Pros:
Significantly lighter (often 1/3 the weight of wood crates), cutting shipping and fuel costs.
Fully recyclable and biodegradable; eco-friendly with lower carbon footprint.
ISPM 15 exempt (no treatment needed).
Customizable for shock absorption; no splinters or screws to damage goods.
Cost-effective for one-way or export shipments.
Cons:
Lower weight capacity than wood or plastic (typically up to 2,000 lbs for some models).
Less suitable for very heavy, abrasive, or outdoor-exposed loads.
May require reinforcement for high-stress applications.
These excel in industries prioritizing sustainability and cost savings on lighter cargo.3. Plastic Pallets and Crates
Made from recycled or virgin polyethylene/polypropylene, plastic options are vented or solid designs tailored for export.
Pros:
Completely ISPM 15 exempt—no treatment, stamps, or pest risks.
Lightweight (30-50% less than wood), reducing transport costs (especially air freight).
Highly durable, hygienic (non-porous, easy to clean/sterilize), and resistant to moisture, chemicals, and pests.
Long lifespan (8-15+ years) with excellent reusability in closed-loop systems.
Consistent dimensions for automated handling.
Cons:
Higher upfront cost (often 3x more than wood, $40–$120 vs. $10–$25).
May be slippery when wet; lower load capacity in some designs (though heavy-duty models handle 1,500+ lbs).
Not ideal for one-way export (costly if not returned).
Environmental concerns if not recycled properly.
Best for hygiene-sensitive sectors (food, pharma) or pooled/reusable systems.4. Other Alternatives
Metal Pallets (Steel, Aluminum, Wire Mesh) — Extremely durable and long-lasting; hygienic and pest-free.
Pros: High strength, reusable indefinitely.
Cons: Heavy (increasing shipping costs), expensive, prone to corrosion in some environments.
Hybrid or Coated Options — Wood frames with corrugated wrapping or plastic coatings.
Pros: Balances cost and performance.
Cons: May still require partial compliance if solid wood is used.
Biodegradable or Bio-Based — Emerging options like coco coir pallets or other plant-derived materials.
Pros: Sustainable and pest-free.
Cons: Limited availability and higher costs currently.
Comparison Table: Key Alternatives at a Glance
Alternative
ISPM 15 Exempt?
Weight vs. Wood
Cost vs. Wood
Load Capacity
Best For
Key Drawback
Engineered Wood (Plywood/OSB/Presswood):
Lighter
Similar/Lower
High
General export crating
Still wood-derived
Corrugated/Honeycomb Cardboard:
Much lighter
Lower
Medium
Sustainable, lighter loads
Lower heavy-duty strength
Plastic:
Lighter
Higher
Medium-High
Hygiene, reusable loops
Upfront cost
Metal:
Heavier
Much higher
Very High
Heavy/industrial reuse
Weight & cost
Choosing the Right Alternative
The best option depends on your cargo:
For heavy machinery or one-way international shipments → Engineered wood or corrugated for cost and compliance ease.
For food/pharma or frequent reuse → Plastic for hygiene and longevity.
For eco-focused or weight-sensitive shipping → Cardboard/honeycomb solutions.
Always verify with your freight forwarder, customs broker, or destination country's regulations, as some may have additional preferences.
Switching to these alternatives not only sidesteps pest detection delays and treatments but often delivers long-term savings through reduced weight, fewer claims, and streamlined logistics. As global trade evolves toward sustainability, these wood-free or low-risk options are becoming mainstream in supply chains. If you're evaluating a switch for your operations, starting with a trial shipment can help assess performance in real-world conditions.
0 Comments