When Mollick points out AI could encourage entrepreneurship, Acemoglu worries we’ll have too much… just absurd level of negativity bias and bad judgment here
Some users defend AI entrepreneurship by noting benefits like better tools for developing markets while many others dismiss Acemoglu's warning of excess activity as silly or unfounded.
Most Activity

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/09/magazine/ai-jobs-workforce-labor.html

@ModeledBehavior It's very funny because this issue was debated a lot during the microfinance boom and it turned out that most people don't want to be entrepreneurs.

@ModeledBehavior This bit was equally silly. Does he think children weren't working to death in the fields before industrialization?

@techn0politics The startup rate is far below historical levels and basically every economist agrees this is a problem, and he is worried we will solve this and also solve it too much. That is hack shit I am sorry

@ModeledBehavior Do you disagree with his analysis that a massive number of new entrants can be distortionary?

@ModeledBehavior Got it, that is helpful context that I did not know. I appreciate you replying!

@techn0politics Sorry I got mad, but I'm mad at him not you

@ModeledBehavior Where does he get this "it is very, very costly and very distortionary"? It's fine.

@besttrousers @ModeledBehavior Most don't even want to work for an entrepreneur. It's exhausting. Or so I imagine.

@ModeledBehavior Acemoglu doesn't take Hayek seriously.

@the_sigh_op2 @ModeledBehavior No they didn't die of lung cancer at age 20 working in the fields? Broad reduction in the QoL is absolutely compatible with technological progress--both agricultural and industrial revolutions are well beaten examples. A priori cannot rule out the AI revolution won't be the same

@ModeledBehavior AI giving entrepreneurs in developing markets access to better advice and tools. How is that a bad thing? 🚀