• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
AI

The challenge of judging an explanation’s quality

A commenter argues that there’s no single way to measure how good an explanation is: the reader and their tastes matter.

Csaba SzepesvariCS
1 Source, 20d ago, first seen 20d ago

TLDR

Judging an explanation depends on who is reading it, a commenter argues in a reply. They point to differences in readers and tastes, cautioning that not everything can be captured by a single numerical score.

Combined views

39

1 Source, first seen 20d ago

Combined views

39

1 Source, first seen 20d ago

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

1 Source

Csaba Szepesvari@CsabaSzepesvari@iScienceLuvr @TaliaRinger I think this is a very good empirical question. But first we have to realize there is no unique way of measuring how well is an exposition. It depends on who the reader, different tastes, etc. (Again, not everything is captured by a single scalar no matter how much I love RL)20d
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI

    1 Source

    Csaba Szepesvari@CsabaSzepesvari@iScienceLuvr @TaliaRinger I think this is a very good empirical question. But first we have to realize there is no unique way of measuring how well is an exposition. It depends on who the reader, different tastes, etc. (Again, not everything is captured by a single scalar no matter how much I love RL)20d
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet