• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Digit-learning model reportedly scores 19.4% across ten digits, 97.5% within pairs

    A user’s Split MNIST experiment suggests poor accuracy across all ten digits can hide a model’s retained ability to distinguish digits when given the correct pair of choices.

    AK
    1 Source, 14d ago, first seen 14d ago

    TLDR

    A user describes training a small neural network on handwritten-digit pairs in sequence: 0/1, 2/3, 4/5, 6/7 and 8/9. Each stage used only that pair’s real training images, followed by a final test on all ten digits.

    With cross-entropy over all ten outputs and SGD, the user reports 19.4% final accuracy—but 97.5% when answers were restricted to the correct digit pair. With Adam, the corresponding results were 19.6% and 71.3%. Results averaged three seeds, with the setup starting at two epochs per task.

    The user’s takeaway: poor ten-class accuracy can hide retained within-pair discrimination.

    Combined views

    177

    1 Source, first seen 14d ago

    Combined views

    177

    1 Source, first seen 14d ago

    4 likes
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    4 likes
    1 comments
    1 saves

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 comments
    1 saves

    1 Source

    @BlackHCWith cross-entropy over all ten outputs + SGD: 19.4% final accuracy. Restrict the same model’s answers choosing from the correct pair: 97.5%! With Adam: 19.6% vs 71.3%. Adam causes more "forgetting" than SGD! Poor ten-class accuracy can hide retained within-pair discrimination

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 Source

    @BlackHCWith cross-entropy over all ten outputs + SGD: 19.4% final accuracy. Restrict the same model’s answers choosing from the correct pair: 97.5%! With Adam: 19.6% vs 71.3%. Adam causes more "forgetting" than SGD! Poor ten-class accuracy can hide retained within-pair discrimination