AIReframing “training” as engineering
A user argues that when a product needs more training—or its training isn't working—what it really needs is more engineering.
TLDR
“Every time someone says ‘training’ replace that with engineering,” one post suggests. The argument treats calls for more training and complaints that training isn't working as two ways of saying a product needs more engineering.
Combined views
3.1K
1 Source, first seen 8h ago
41 likes
Reframing “training” as engineering
A user argues that when a product needs more training—or its training isn't working—what it really needs is more engineering.
TLDR
“Every time someone says ‘training’ replace that with engineering,” one post suggests. The argument treats calls for more training and complaints that training isn't working as two ways of saying a product needs more engineering.
