Reaction
Where is the source of truth for how AI-assisted software should work?
A post argues that quick fixes can undo functionality when the reasons behind existing behavior aren’t clear.
TLDR
A post argues that AI-assisted software work has mostly moved past the “slop” problem, but people fixing issues can accidentally undo functionality. Tests may not capture why other seemingly valid solutions were rejected, and additional documentation can drift. The author asks where teams should keep the source of truth for how their software is supposed to work.
Combined views
21.2K
1 Source, first seen ago