• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    LLM “reasoning tokens” and false trust in AI explanations

    The poster says they discussed the “questionable semantics” of reasoning tokens with WSJ journalist Christopher Mims and shared a paper cited in the article.

    SK
    1 Source, 3h ago, first seen 3h ago

    TLDR

    The poster says they spoke with WSJ journalist Christopher Mims about the “questionable semantics” of LLM reasoning tokens. They link the paper “Evaluating the False Trust engendered by LLM Explanations,” saying the WSJ article cites it and that it will be presented at a NeurIPS 2026 workshop.

    Combined views

    282

    1 Source, first seen 3h ago

    Combined views

    282

    1 Source, first seen 3h ago

    1 likes
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 likes

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 Source

    @rao2zbtw, here is the false trust paper cited in the WSJ piece: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10930; it will be presented at the #NeurIPS2026 workshop on Trustworthy AI for Good).3h

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 Source

    @rao2zbtw, here is the false trust paper cited in the WSJ piece: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10930; it will be presented at the #NeurIPS2026 workshop on Trustworthy AI for Good).3h