• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Taylor Lorenz Warns on Child Protection Pretexts for Speech Laws

    She cites Russia, China, and Europe using child safety as cover for speech controls.

    TL
    MT
    3 Sources, 29d ago, first seen 29d ago

    TLDR

    A tweet by @MTSlive recaps a 19-minute interview with Taylor Lorenz, Theo Jaffee, and another guest. Lorenz states that authoritarian speech restrictions in Russia during the early 2010s, in China, and now in Europe have consistently been introduced under the claim of protecting children. She adds that SpaceXAI is correct to challenge the Minnesota deepfake law. The post describes the attached video as a split-screen recording showing the three participants with name tags and subtitles.

    Combined views

    27.9K

    3 Sources, first seen 29d ago

    Combined views

    27.9K

    3 Sources, first seen 29d ago

    99 likes
    99 likes
    8 comments
    22 saves
    15 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    8 comments
    22 saves
    15 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    3 Sources

    @MTSliveTaylor Lorenz calls out California SB 1119 for rules so vague that AI companies will censor far more than the law actually requires: "It's completely ridiculous. This is overly censorious, horrible regulation that is gonna diminish the quality of the product for every consumer user." "Trying to say, really be strict about what they can say and what they cannot say, but also vague enough that the companies will just overcomply. It will lead to these companies censoring far more content and information than the law technically requires." "For instance, they were restricting excessive praise or flattery. What counts as excessive?" "We know that the government just chooses examples. They enforce these laws in whatever way they want to punish whoever they want because it's all completely subjective." @TaylorLorenz @UserMagazine
    @TaylorLorenzRT @MTSlive: Taylor Lorenz calls out California SB 1119 for rules so vague that AI companies will censor far more than the law actually req…

    3 Sources

    @MTSliveTaylor Lorenz calls out California SB 1119 for rules so vague that AI companies will censor far more than the law actually requires: "It's completely ridiculous. This is overly censorious, horrible regulation that is gonna diminish the quality of the product for every consumer user." "Trying to say, really be strict about what they can say and what they cannot say, but also vague enough that the companies will just overcomply. It will lead to these companies censoring far more content and information than the law technically requires." "For instance, they were restricting excessive praise or flattery. What counts as excessive?" "We know that the government just chooses examples. They enforce these laws in whatever way they want to punish whoever they want because it's all completely subjective." @TaylorLorenz @UserMagazine
    @TaylorLorenzRT @MTSlive: Taylor Lorenz calls out California SB 1119 for rules so vague that AI companies will censor far more than the law actually req…