• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    AI reasoning models’ usefulness for conceptual search

    The user argues that AI can help rule out insufficient searching as an innovation bottleneck, allowing a shift toward developing new prerequisite ideas.

    MK
    1 Source, 18d ago, first seen 18d ago

    TLDR

    One user frames discovery as two problems: knowing the prerequisite ideas, which they call coverage, and selecting and combining the right ones, which they call search. The difficulty, they say, is knowing which is the bottleneck. They argue that AI reasoning models and swarms are useful for conceptual search, making it possible to empirically rule out insufficient searching and shift attention toward developing new prerequisite ideas.

    Combined views

    2.2K

    1 Source, first seen 18d ago

    Combined views

    2.2K

    1 Source, first seen 18d ago

    27 likes
    27 likes
    4 comments
    5 saves

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    4 comments
    5 saves

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @mikeknoopAI reasoning models (+swarms) are now useful for conceptual search. This is a powerful tool for innovation because we can empirically rule out "have we looked hard enough?" and switch gears to develop new pre-requisite ideas.

    1 Source

    @mikeknoopAI reasoning models (+swarms) are now useful for conceptual search. This is a powerful tool for innovation because we can empirically rule out "have we looked hard enough?" and switch gears to develop new pre-requisite ideas.