Positive users see low paid AI subscription rates around 2% of households as proof the market remains early with strong growth ahead, while negative users dismiss the numbers as insignificant or reply with frustration and hostility.
Based on 30 visible X reactions from 250 accounts.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
Beff says low adoption allows labs to subsidize AI.
@ebloch @omooretweets “Everyone will lose to our ai web scrapers” “Your ai, your phone, your computer” “More datacenters” “Anti datacenters is Chinese propaganda” lol. Leftist homo retards
@AutoCrossBow0 @rohanpaul_ai Most people only look at current cash flow and completely miss the compounding infrastructure being built underneath. That is where the real leverage is
@rohanpaul_ai Shinka has a point. AI adoption will probably look like background infra, not standalone SaaS apps. The real battle is distribution, not just tech.
@omooretweets This is insane to see, encouraging for sure...
@tekbog good news for AI. the humans are still optimistic
This is why the labs have been able to offer $7k/mo of value for $200/mo so far. When the normies join that era is over. Start saving money for tokens.
we are still so early. roughly 98% of US households still do not pay for AI. the market is nowhere close to saturation.
Only 2.2% of U.S. households have a paid AI subscription We are still so early
Positive users see low paid AI subscription rates around 2% of households as proof the market remains early with strong growth ahead, while negative users dismiss the numbers as insignificant or reply with frustration and hostility.
Based on 30 visible X reactions from 250 accounts.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@omooretweets Imagine not having Codex