AI Delivers Precise Nuance Feedback On Complex Theory Stacks
i dont want to get sucked into an ai whirlpool but it's honestly pretty hard, can't imagine how it'll feel in two years. a lot of what i care about is ideas, and talking to humans is starting to feel like.. clunky. explaining 5 interleaved theories takes an hour, vs like 20s
Nick@nickcammaratathe level of nuance is just so wild, i can voice dictate for 5 minutes about some stack of theories i have and how they interact and it can find exactly the flaw in paragraph 17 and i'm like wow yeah you're right and i cant get that with humans
and that's discounting the case where it goes and writes thousands of lines of code in a couple minutes to go test and build its own ideas and we explore them together. or like here's 5 related papers from obscure physics fields you've never thought of. just not even close tbh
Nick@nickcammaratai dont want to get sucked into an ai whirlpool but it's honestly pretty hard, can't imagine how it'll feel in two years. a lot of what i care about is ideas, and talking to humans is starting to feel like.. clunky. explaining 5 interleaved theories takes an hour, vs like 20s
diminishing returns will help people, and maybe the weird archetypes will be eaten first. the weird professor archetype people who want to learn and discuss niche ideas all day. the empaths who want to connect as maximally as possible. for whom 10x better is actually 10x better
Nick@nickcammarataand that's discounting the case where it goes and writes thousands of lines of code in a couple minutes to go test and build its own ideas and we explore them together. or like here's 5 related papers from obscure physics fields you've never thought of. just not even close tbh