• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI
    Report

    A quip about OpenAI having 'completely lost control' of its models

    A user jokes that OpenAI looks to have lost control of its models, without naming a model or describing an incident.

    JS
    JA
    GM
    23 Sources, ,

    TLDR

    In an October 1 quote-post, a user wrote, 'looks like OpenAI has completely lost control over their models lol.' The user's added text gives no details about what prompted the quip.

    Combined views

    456.6K

    23 Sources, first seen 5h ago

    4.1K likes

    Combined views

    456.6K

    23 Sources, first seen 5h ago

    4.1K likes
    5h ago
    first seen 5h ago
    224 comments
    751 saves
    293 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Featured Source
    224 comments
    751 saves
    293 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    #1

    Today's Rank

    #1

    24 Sources

    The Wall Street JournalExclusive | OpenAI Parts Ways With Researchers Who Allegedly Shared Confidential Information
    @Bayesian0_0Three AI safety researchers just left OpenAI
    @scaling01looks like OpenAI has completely lost control over their models lol
    @menhguinRT @Bayesian0_0: Three AI safety researchers just left OpenAI
    @ZeffMaxNEW: OpenAI has parted ways with three researchers that allegedly shared sensitive information with a third party AI safety organization. Developing... https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openai-parts-ways-with-researchers-who-allegedly-shared-confidential-information-aebac528?mod=author_content_page_1_pos_1
    @teortaxesTexOpenAI safety team Mk.4: «now, OUR job here is done»
    @AndrewCurran_Reporting from the WSJ. That fact that three alignment/safety researchers left this morning was already being discussed here on X.
    @KateClarkTweetsRT @ZeffMax: NEW: OpenAI has parted ways with three researchers that allegedly shared sensitive information with a third party AI safety or…
    @jachiam0I'm going to wait for a bit more information to come out before forming a very firm opinion, but at first glance this looks like a real own-goal. We're in a very strange moment in history around the collective understanding of artificial superintelligence and paths to safety around it, and a very difficult moment for trust in the AI labs to do the right thing where it comes to independent oversight and verification. Company procedures can (and somewhat obviously should) have some flexibility here to accomodate actions that might in the future be widely understood as whistleblowing. While I don't think safety researchers should have infinite latitude to disclose technical secrets, the exact kind of information they allegedly "mishandled" matters *a lot* and I would expect to see a more detailed account of what that information supposedly was to justify an action so enormously consequential and potentially damaging.
    @rohanpaul_aihttps://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openai-parts-ways-with-researchers-who-allegedly-shared-confidential-information-aebac528

    24 Sources

    The Wall Street JournalExclusive | OpenAI Parts Ways With Researchers Who Allegedly Shared Confidential Information
    @Bayesian0_0Three AI safety researchers just left OpenAI
    @scaling01looks like OpenAI has completely lost control over their models lol
    @menhguinRT @Bayesian0_0: Three AI safety researchers just left OpenAI
    @ZeffMaxNEW: OpenAI has parted ways with three researchers that allegedly shared sensitive information with a third party AI safety organization. Developing... https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openai-parts-ways-with-researchers-who-allegedly-shared-confidential-information-aebac528?mod=author_content_page_1_pos_1
    @teortaxesTexOpenAI safety team Mk.4: «now, OUR job here is done»
    @AndrewCurran_Reporting from the WSJ. That fact that three alignment/safety researchers left this morning was already being discussed here on X.
    @KateClarkTweetsRT @ZeffMax: NEW: OpenAI has parted ways with three researchers that allegedly shared sensitive information with a third party AI safety or…
    @jachiam0I'm going to wait for a bit more information to come out before forming a very firm opinion, but at first glance this looks like a real own-goal. We're in a very strange moment in history around the collective understanding of artificial superintelligence and paths to safety around it, and a very difficult moment for trust in the AI labs to do the right thing where it comes to independent oversight and verification. Company procedures can (and somewhat obviously should) have some flexibility here to accomodate actions that might in the future be widely understood as whistleblowing. While I don't think safety researchers should have infinite latitude to disclose technical secrets, the exact kind of information they allegedly "mishandled" matters *a lot* and I would expect to see a more detailed account of what that information supposedly was to justify an action so enormously consequential and potentially damaging.
    @rohanpaul_aihttps://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openai-parts-ways-with-researchers-who-allegedly-shared-confidential-information-aebac528