FirstMark's Matt Turck proposes a moderate AI future, while Gary Marcus questions if incremental gains justify high development costs
Marcus notes that AI currently lacks short-term reliability.
@mattturck that’s the likely scenario (though the reliability isn’t there in short term), and in that scenario it’s not clear the economics make sense
Matt Turck@mattturckThe biggest mindf*ck scenario in AI: things don’t change that much. Both doomers and accelerationists turn out to be wrong. We are all more productive. Agents deliver automation in the enterprise. Some important scientific discoveries are made. All great. But that’s it.
#687Bojan Tunguz@TUNGUZyeah no. we’ll get some crazy as f*** discoveries over the next few years. many of which will significantly improve people’s lives.
Matt Turck@mattturckThe biggest mindf*ck scenario in AI: things don’t change that much. Both doomers and accelerationists turn out to be wrong. We are all more productive. Agents deliver automation in the enterprise. Some important scientific discoveries are made. All great. But that’s it.