AIReactionLooking back at early GPT reviewsA user says it’s “wild” to revisit early GPT reviews.digg it11012345678901234567892 Sources, 30m ago, first seen 30m agoTLDRA user calls it “wild” to go back and read early GPT reviews, sharing a link to an older post.Combined views—2 Sources, first seen 30m ago— likes— comments— saves— repostsCombined views—2 Sources, first seen 30m ago— likes— comments— saves— reposts
