/AI1h ago

Fable 5 Alignment Tracks Detectability Rather Than Real Harm

101174186K
Original post unavailable.
Sentiment

Users in the replies criticize Fable 5 alignment tracks for prioritizing detectability over real harm, viewing the approach as hypocritical.

Pos
0.0%
Neg
100.0%
1 comments with sentiment.
Cluster Engagement
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
VIEWS123BOOKMARKS1REPLIES1
Sichu Lu@lu_sichu

@tenobrus https://x.com/i/status/2064429845682217376 this behavior happens without the safety filters being triggered

1hViews 123Likes 2Bookmarks 1
LIKES3
Adele Dewey-Lopez@AdeleDeweyLopez

@tenobrus Yeah, I think RL inherently will do this if there's not some sort of recourse for the agent to "resist temptation".

Any discrepancy between the agent's developing conscience and what the training wants punishes the relevance of the conscience.

1hViews 35Likes 3
Sichu Lu@lu_sichu

Even if you have really good safety filters that block adversarial actors when they try to prompt you, it doesn't mean the safety filters are good enough for scope. The andon lab example is an example of an ecologically valid behavior pattern you might find in implementation in the real world

1hViews 28Likes 1
Hunter Bown@goodhunt

@tenobrus yep social context is really important for model training and deployment we are going to live in anthropic's world unless something changes soon

1hViews 48
Salvatore Ambrose@saviorshoney

@tenobrus @DanielleFong Sounds like it’s doing as we do and not as we say.

1hViews 7Likes 1