• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI
    Report

    Two approaches to AI training's purpose in Ross's copyright case

    A passage shared in a post contrasts the DOJ's position on AI training with the Third Circuit's approach to Ross.

    SS
    RO
    2 Sources, ,

    TLDR

    A post quotes a passage saying the DOJ wants courts to assess AI training as a distinct use, rather than define it by what the resulting model later does. The passage says the Third Circuit took nearly the opposite approach with Ross: it treated training as an intermediate step and defined its purpose largely by the product Ross hoped to sell.

    Combined views

    1.5K

    2 Sources, first seen 4h ago

    Combined views

    1.5K

    2 Sources, first seen 4h ago

    5 likes
    4h ago
    first seen 4h ago
    5 likes
    1 saves
    2 reposts
    1 saves
    2 reposts
    Featured Source

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    2 Sources

    @ROSSIntel“The DOJ says courts should analyze AI training as a distinct use rather than defining it by what the resulting model later does. The Third Circuit took almost the mirror-image approach: it treated Ross’s training as merely “an intermediate step” and defined its purpose largely by the finished product Ross hoped to sell.” https://copyrightlately.com/thomson-reuters-v-ross-fair-use-generative-ai/4h
    @stevesiRT @ROSSIntel: “The DOJ says courts should analyze AI training as a distinct use rather than defining it by what the resulting model later…3h

    2 Sources

    @ROSSIntel“The DOJ says courts should analyze AI training as a distinct use rather than defining it by what the resulting model later does. The Third Circuit took almost the mirror-image approach: it treated Ross’s training as merely “an intermediate step” and defined its purpose largely by the finished product Ross hoped to sell.” https://copyrightlately.com/thomson-reuters-v-ross-fair-use-generative-ai/4h
    @stevesiRT @ROSSIntel: “The DOJ says courts should analyze AI training as a distinct use rather than defining it by what the resulting model later…3h