Report
Two approaches to AI training's purpose in Ross's copyright case
A passage shared in a post contrasts the DOJ's position on AI training with the Third Circuit's approach to Ross.
TLDR
A post quotes a passage saying the DOJ wants courts to assess AI training as a distinct use, rather than define it by what the resulting model later does. The passage says the Third Circuit took nearly the opposite approach with Ross: it treated training as an intermediate step and defined its purpose largely by the product Ross hoped to sell.
Combined views
1.5K
2 Sources, first seen ago
