Many users criticize Anthropic's mandatory data retention as a dealbreaker and bad deal for enterprises handing over data at premium prices, while others praise the choice of GPT-5.6 for its lower cost and policy flexibility.
Based on 15 visible X reactions from 32 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@GergelyOrosz Not to mention how much cheaper GPT 5.6 is compared to Fable(and even token efficient)! Which is very important for enterprises paying API prices.
@GergelyOrosz I’m seeing more and more engineers prefer GPT models. Giving away data while paying a premium for Anthropic is a bad deal
@ThibaultJaigu @GergelyOrosz @RequestyAI We don’t care about your slop shilling
@__vandos__ AI slop reply account Blocked
@GergelyOrosz makes perfect sense same here
@GeorgePaulChi @GergelyOrosz AI slop response
Interesting take on Fable vs GPT-5.6 Sol. From a dev at a large, and "AI-bullish" company, spending $$$ on AI: "Anthropic has not changed their data retention policy on Fable, meaning they would store our data. So we cannot use it. We're going HARD on GPT-5.6 Sol as a result.
@GergelyOrosz So much about "safety is just marketing" ^^'
Many users criticize Anthropic's mandatory data retention as a dealbreaker and bad deal for enterprises handing over data at premium prices, while others praise the choice of GPT-5.6 for its lower cost and policy flexibility.
Based on 15 visible X reactions from 32 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@GeorgePaulChi @GergelyOrosz AI slop response