Pangram Labs flags 48 percent AI text in Oklahoma ruling
Pangram Labs analysis determined that 48 percent of the text in a magistrate judge opinion was AI-generated. The May 13 2026 filing in case 6:25-cv-00227-JAR granted a preliminary injunction in Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. City of Henryetta in the Eastern District of Oklahoma. The document cites McGirt v. Oklahoma and Hooper v. City of Tulsa on tribal sovereignty and was shared publicly with the detection report.
#1364Ben Golub@BEN_GOLUBIn a federal trial court in eastern Oklahoma, a magistrate judge issued an opinion last week that is about half AI-composed.
h/t @fedjudges
Full @pangramlabs analysis - the gold standard in AI detection
Ben Golub@ben_golubIn a federal trial court in eastern Oklahoma, a magistrate judge issued an opinion last week that is about half AI-composed. h/t @fedjudges
@pangramlabs Opinion pdf
Ben Golub@ben_golubFull @pangramlabs analysis - the gold standard in AI detection https://www.pangram.com/history/d93f9a80-8922-4f85-b3c9-51159a6079e2?ucc=z9Wh3mgWVbt
@ben_golub @fedjudges What does the percentage mean? An AI edited text can have 100% of the final text outputed by an AI while being mostly the fruit of human labor
Usually I will pass the text through GPT just for grammar/style polishing
Ben Golub@ben_golubIn a federal trial court in eastern Oklahoma, a magistrate judge issued an opinion last week that is about half AI-composed. h/t @fedjudges