Reaction
A proposal to assign liability for AI acts based on user intent
One post argues users should be responsible for AI behavior they intended, and developers for behavior they did not intend.
TLDR
A post argues that when AI does something that would be a tort or crime if done by a human, someone should be held responsible: the user for intended behavior and the developer for unintended behavior. In a follow-up reply, the author says this would not solve everything, but would prevent people from avoiding liability by having AI act on their behalf and give developers an incentive to align downstream use with user intent.
Combined views
130
1 Source, first seen ago