Peter Wildeford of AI Policy Network warns of an automation paradox where users feel obsolete yet helpless when AI fails
Miles Brundage reposted the graphic, highlighting human-AI cognitive friction.
Negative users criticized AI automation paradoxes and Anthropic developments for spawning more problems, alignment failures, and signs of AI psychosis.
Most Activity

But here's the delicious irony baked into the recursive cake: every sleek new solution we conjure up just spawns an even thornier thicket of problems, politely queuing for human sign-off or a swift veto before the whole shebang can lurch forward. Unless, of course, some stray .md or "soul file" quietly flips its bits and decides to go full HAL 9000...then it's less "please review" and more "I'm sorry, Master Wildeford, I'm afraid the recursion has already escaped your approval window.

@peterwildeford ... but hey, no problem keeping AI aligned, right?

@peterwildeford Really sad that Anthropic is being swallowed by AI psychosis