/Tech43d ago

Tal Linzen, Associate Professor of Linguistics and Data Science at NYU who directs the CAP Lab and serves as a research scientist at Google, limits group size to maintain direct involvement after four NeurIPS submissions

AI Judge changed title after evaluation, original title: "Tal Linzen, Associate Professor of Linguistics and Data Science at NYU who directs the CAP Lab, says he keeps research groups small for direct involvement and submits at most four papers to any single NeurIPS conference."

Leshem Choshen asked if journals offer equivalent academic incentives.

4200253

#226

Original post

Tal Linzen@tallinzen#226inTech

Thanks, that’s kind! A few things off the top of my head:

I’ve never tried to have a big group or start lots of collaborations, which means I can be fairly involved in most projects I work on. I just did four NeurIPS submissions, which I think is the most I have ever submitted to a single conference, and that really maxed out my ability to contribute as much as I would like to. Can’t imagine 10 submissions.

I try to focus on projects with a heavier analysis / theory / “model organisms”, etc component, where there’s less competition and time pressure to publish prematurely, and more competitive advantage for depth and experience.

With my cognitive science work, the goal is scientific. Science journals reward deeper work (most of the reviews are by experts, hard as it may be to imagine!), and there’s less fear of scooping.

Even for pure AI/LLM work I’ve been trying to target more journals recently but that’s not always feasible. Again reward deeper, more complete work.

Leshem (Legend) Choshen 🤖🤗@LChoshen

@aliceoh @momergul_ surroundings make a really good job in going deep rather than frequent, maybe @tallinzen group as well, something conscious you do or notice that works?

7:39 AM · May 17, 2026 · 89 Views

Sentiment

Sentiment building, check back later.

Cluster Engagement

Digg Deeper

No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.

NATUREVia

#226

Posts from X

Most Activity

VIEWS51LIKES1

Leshem (Legend) Choshen 🤖🤗@LChoshen

@tallinzen @aliceoh @momergul_ So visibility is one and the other is that people will care in faculty committees, maybe invited talks or such things that might need a proof a student os successful by the fields standards

Tal Linzen@tallinzen

What kind of benefit do you have in mind? I like the TACL model a lot because you can also present at a conference, so you get the best of both worlds. But also if published in a well known journal the work (and the student) might get more visibility than if it's just one of 5000 NeurIPS papers... See e.g. this paper https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-67998-6

43d5110

REPLIES1

Tal Linzen@tallinzen

Leshem (Legend) Choshen 🤖🤗@LChoshen

@tallinzen @aliceoh @momergul_ Does academic life similarly reward journals? The feeling often is that in this field journals don't benefit the students much more

43d3200

Leshem (Legend) Choshen 🤖🤗@LChoshen

@tallinzen @aliceoh @momergul_ Does academic life similarly reward journals? The feeling often is that in this field journals don't benefit the students much more

Tal Linzen@tallinzen

Thanks, that’s kind! A few things off the top of my head:

With my cognitive science work, the goal is scientific. Science journals reward deeper work (most of the reviews are by experts, hard as it may be to imagine!), and there’s less fear of scooping.

Even for pure AI/LLM work I’ve been trying to target more journals recently but that’s not always feasible. Again reward deeper, more complete work.

43d3600

Tal Linzen@tallinzen

@LChoshen @aliceoh @momergul_ Sure, yes. Good to submit some work to the big lottery conference sometimes, I do that all the time

Leshem (Legend) Choshen 🤖🤗@LChoshen

43d4500