If we strip away the headlines about Mythos 5, the story is brutally simple: someone, somewhere, is deciding what level of intelligence you and your company are allowed to access.
XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis warns against centralized AI access limits, prompting calls for an AI bill of rights
Story Overview
XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis flagged risks from centralized decisions on who gets advanced AI capabilities, a stance that quickly drew replies urging an AI bill of rights and protections for cognitive privacy, all sparked by recent releases referred to as Mythos 5 and Fable 5.
Access thresholds remain unclear
No public details exist yet on rollout timelines, pricing tiers, or exact capability cutoffs for the new models, leaving open how strictly limits will be enforced.
Governance questions surface fast
Diamandis and others are asking who ultimately sets intelligence ceilings for users and companies, with some replies framing the issue as a potential human-rights matter around thought privacy.
Negative users dismissed claims about centralized control limiting AI access as delusional or ignorant, while positive users agreed open source will win and better models are inevitable.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
Most Activity
safe agi should be beneficial and accessible to all
If we strip away the headlines about Mythos 5, the story is brutally simple: someone, somewhere, is deciding what level of intelligence you and your company are allowed to access.

@PeterDiamandis Exactly , this is how we eventually end up in a real-world Elysium with a nice mix of idiocracy. 🤷♂️

@PeterDiamandis Not just any someone, a table of the Epstein-list-tier psychopaths many of whom were literally on the list. Why do normies consent to being ruled by demonic forces? It's a constant confusion for me...

@PeterDiamandis Someone, somewhere. *shivers* Yet you advocate for mass surveillance? From someone, somewhere.

@PeterDiamandis Controlling that basically means controlling our life

@PeterDiamandis Thats very true and frustrating to a great degree, there's a strong need for systems that are dependable and reliable. And the refusals by these systems needs to be explained to the users otherwise we may just create AI models that manipulate us instead of being helpful

@PeterDiamandis It's only going to get worse if these big labs hold all the cards. The closer we get to AGI to more tightly held these models will become. Only the tech elite and the connected class will have access.

@PeterDiamandis Precisely.
The most important curve, the intelligence curve, is being manipulated by the federal government.

@PeterDiamandis Paper Doll Productions accesses divine intelligence

@PeterDiamandis Don't think it's that simple. Dario's endless Doommaxxing is a major factor here

@Marvinma12 @PeterDiamandis Controlling that basically means controlling our life

@PeterDiamandis Someone somewhere is afraid of power in the wrong hands.
We’re still a bit afraid of who we really are.

@AnvithOne @PeterDiamandis Yes this may be the sad reality if some companies continue on this trajectory

@PeterDiamandis They own the models, Mythos hacked the nsa in hours, and the government banned it. You have no right to their models or to intelligence for that matter. What kind of crackpot position are taking here?

@PeterDiamandis

Yes, lets strip away the headlines. Everyone is afraid of AI in some form, but up until now the general feeling has been not to try to regulate AI. What is different now? This particular AI release provides tools to enable a large community to hack into private and commercial systems. This is a recognition by the developer and governments that maybe we should be careful of what gets general release. So lets take a pause and think about controls.

@PeterDiamandis A story as old as time. It started with Gutenberg’s printing press technology in the 1440s, then the Enlightenment and the banning of books. As Mark Twain says, history doesn’t repeat but it often rhymes.

@PeterDiamandis

@PeterDiamandis

@PeterDiamandis