/AI10h ago

Google DeepMind's Susan Zhang argues abundant AI content shifts the premium from raw intelligence to human relationships and social dynamics

AI Judge changed title after evaluation, original title: "Google DeepMind's Susan Zhang argues abundant AI shifts societal value from raw intelligence to authentic human connection"

Other researchers highlighted current AI's high verbosity.

1822276724.9K
Original post
Susan Zhang@suchenzang#59inAI

ilya was ahead of his time, but he (or we, as readers) might've miscalculated the side effect of freely-available-slop-intelligence now putting premiums on "the human touch"

it was either never about intelligence or always about intelligence, just not in commonly measurable forms

or perhaps it had nothing to do with AI at all, and was more about who to surround yourself with

transactional relationships based on mutual-assurance of being in similarly "intelligent" company...

...or something deeper?

if you value intelligence above all other human qualities, you’re gonna have a bad time

5:43 PM · Jun 7, 2026 · 21.9K Views
Sentiment

Positive users affirm the growing value of human touch as AI intelligence becomes cheaper, while negative users decry low-quality AI-generated documents and feel AI is making things worse.

Pos
25.0%
Neg
75.0%
4 comments with sentiment.
Cluster Engagement
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
VIEWS1K
Chris Paxton@chris_j_paxton

@suchenzang The ironic thing is that I still find AI writing to be *worse* in some ineffable way, as compared to human writing

but I do love writing and maybe this is a bias of mine

Susan Zhang@suchenzang

ilya was ahead of his time, but he (or we, as readers) might've miscalculated the side effect of freely-available-slop-intelligence now putting premiums on "the human touch"

it was either never about intelligence or always about intelligence, just not in commonly measurable forms

or perhaps it had nothing to do with AI at all, and was more about who to surround yourself with

transactional relationships based on mutual-assurance of being in similarly "intelligent" company...

...or something deeper?

7hViews 1KLikes 13Bookmarks 0
BOOKMARKS1
Susan Zhang@suchenzang

@chris_j_paxton the premium of human touch! for lovers of writing, readers of smut, but not for contract lawyers, alas

Susan Zhang@suchenzang

absolutely tickled by how these llms currently seem to work better for lawyer-y tasks than they do for my friend who's been ghostwriting smut for the last 15+ years

specifically, she says:

> biggest pain point is the fact that output matters for writing but coders just care that the code works

> coders are fine with repetitive elements and inefficiently written statements, but when writing, the repetitive patterns turn into limericks after 300 words

> which then requires me to either prevent this at the input level by heavily seeding the inputs with non slop writing patterns or almost go through entire rewrites on the outputs

> the former means a 100k book might require 50k words of scaffolding

> the latter means i'm probably rewriting 75k by hand

and her comment today:

7hViews 879Likes 7Bookmarks 1
LIKES15RETWEETS1
Herbie Bradley@herbiebradley

@suchenzang perhaps the most common failure mode of SF's view of the economy is to see knowledge work as a market of intelligence-based services

but it's actually a relational bargaining system layered on top of intelligence

Susan Zhang@suchenzang

ilya was ahead of his time, but he (or we, as readers) might've miscalculated the side effect of freely-available-slop-intelligence now putting premiums on "the human touch"

it was either never about intelligence or always about intelligence, just not in commonly measurable forms

or perhaps it had nothing to do with AI at all, and was more about who to surround yourself with

transactional relationships based on mutual-assurance of being in similarly "intelligent" company...

...or something deeper?

8hViews 780Likes 15Bookmarks 0
REPLIES1
Susan Zhang@suchenzang

@chris_j_paxton writing as art will remain art

writing as pure utilitarian conduits for synchronizing information flow between biological humans on the other hand...

Chris Paxton@chris_j_paxton

@suchenzang I kinda figured it was just that there are limits to LfD but not to reinforcement learning, and you can't really RL your way to a good essay or novel chapter because the success condition is less clear

7hViews 128Likes 2Bookmarks 0
Nick@NickFlows

@suchenzang My issue is people keep sending me Claude generated documents that, after reading 5-6 pages of a 40 page document, end up having two sentences worth of non-trival information.

10hViews 241Likes 6
Carlos E. Perez@IntuitMachine

Surviving the test of time.

if you value intelligence above all other human qualities, you’re gonna have a bad time

26mViews 328Likes 2Bookmarks 0
Chris Paxton@chris_j_paxton

@suchenzang I kinda figured it was just that there are limits to LfD but not to reinforcement learning, and you can't really RL your way to a good essay or novel chapter because the success condition is less clear

Susan Zhang@suchenzang

@chris_j_paxton the premium of human touch! for lovers of writing, readers of smut, but not for contract lawyers, alas

7hViews 169Likes 1Bookmarks 0
Note Able@curiousgangsta

@suchenzang just look at how large portions of the math community reacted to recent ai progress in their field. that’s part of what he meant.

9hViews 96Likes 4
Chris Paxton@chris_j_paxton

@suchenzang At least so far, AI writing has the exact same problem as AI coding, which is that it's far too verbose for the limited information content

Susan Zhang@suchenzang

@chris_j_paxton writing as art will remain art

writing as pure utilitarian conduits for synchronizing information flow between biological humans on the other hand...

7hViews 181Likes 2Bookmarks 0
Alim@almmaasoglu

I think Ilya was making a point that operates on three levels at once personal, social, and civilizational.

He meant that intelligence is a powerful optimizer, but if you make it your highest value, you end up superbly equipped to navigate the world while increasingly blind to why you're living in it at all

9hViews 274Likes 1
Susan Zhang@suchenzang

@herbiebradley that still sounds quite transactional

8hViews 31Likes 2
Susan Zhang@suchenzang

@chris_j_paxton more tokens == more exploration space for random-walking* towards a desirable reward

token-based pricing also makes verbosity a very desirable feature to fill the coffers with

win win win

*rl people don't come at me for gratuitously using "random" here

Chris Paxton@chris_j_paxton

@suchenzang At least so far, AI writing has the exact same problem as AI coding, which is that it's far too verbose for the limited information content

7hViews 58Likes 1Bookmarks 0
Nick@NickFlows

@suchenzang I should really just have claude-offs at work. Whenever someone sends me a Claude-generated document, I only pass it to Claude and ask it to generate a response which I copy-paste back to the "author".

10hViews 38Likes 1
Herbie Bradley@herbiebradley

@suchenzang yes, there are definitely better phrasings further away from the transactional end of the spectrum, but this phrasing I've found communicates the vibe of the idea to AI people reasonably

Susan Zhang@suchenzang

@herbiebradley that still sounds quite transactional

4hViews 60Likes 0Bookmarks 0
Rohan@proxy_vector

@suchenzang Yes. As intelligence gets cheaper, taste, trust, and emotional precision get more expensive. Human touch stops being a soft bonus and becomes the filter for what people value.

9hViews 57
Chad Brewbaker@SMT_Solvers

@suchenzang I wish he worked with @Alibaba_Qwen and @NousResearch on a model harness with high agency and "street smarts".

8hViews 33
Unit Accord@unit_accord

@IntuitMachine No I'm actually continuously disappointed by our lack of intelligence. And AI is only making everything worse.

21mViews 3