Priming Claude For Hyperpolation Produces Less Personalized Philosophical Responses
The attractor structure is invariant to the priming - there is a lot of direct overlap in what is proposed in seemingly independent runs for concepts and applications. That is interesting and concerning (but in line with known issues). Results more due to weights than prompt.
When comparing the threads, Claude noted that priming for hyperpolation *reduced* the personalization of the responses. Maybe because the prime pulled in a philosophical direction, producing "cosplaying hyperpolation" (which might result in less useful results!)