The role of learning in predicting how AI strategies transfer
A user points to chain-of-thought reasoning as the rationale: problems break down into reusable steps, and strategies can work well across very different domains.
TLDR
A user argues that AI training does not necessarily require a strong mechanistic theory of transfer beforehand. Instead, they favor a learned function that predicts transfer for a given policy, and say such a function can be built. Their intuition comes from chain-of-thought reasoning: problems break down into subroutines that can be combined, and strategies can work well across very different problems and domains. That, they argue, is why predicting transfer probably has to be learned.
Combined views
1.1K
1 Source, first seen 19d ago