User cites ChatGPT to argue a further autopsy would be useful

A user who says they are not a doctor shared a ChatGPT answer to argue for a further autopsy informed by circumstances apparently unknown during the first examination. The user says prosecutors cited cardiac arrest and a July autopsy that favored a toxicological explanation over trauma caused by another person. The quoted AI answer sketches a hypothetical progression from head impact to bleeding inside the skull and cardiac arrest. It says delayed deterioration could fit the described timeline, but explicitly notes that this does not establish the person had a subdural hematoma—a bleed around the brain.