• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
AI
Reaction

DeepSeek reportedly built something similar to Opus’s version, but its physics suffered from explosions

A user says they gave the DeepSeek version feedback after explosions affected its physics; its second try was fully autonomous.

Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)T(
2 Sources, 1h ago, first seen 1h ago

TLDR

A user says Opus performed well and DeepSeek built basically the same thing, though explosions caused problems with the DeepSeek version’s physics. After giving it feedback, the user says the second try was fully autonomous. They put the API costs at about $2 and $1.

Combined views

3.4K

2 Sources, first seen 1h ago

32 likes3 comments11 saves

Combined views

3.4K

2 Sources, first seen 1h ago

32 likes3 comments11 saves
Image: @teortaxesTex on X

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Featured Source

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

2 Sources

Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)@teortaxesTexOpus really is very good DeepSeek has built basically the same thing but the physics suffered from explosions. I had to give it some feedback. 2nd try is fully autonomous. ≈$2 and $1 at API costs1h
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI

    2 Sources

    Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)@teortaxesTexOpus really is very good DeepSeek has built basically the same thing but the physics suffered from explosions. I had to give it some feedback. 2nd try is fully autonomous. ≈$2 and $1 at API costs1h
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet