Wastes so much tokens
when you let GPT-5.5 do its thing with /goal
"just one more smoke test PLEAAASE"
An independent AI infrastructure analyst known as Zephyr highlights how GPT-5.5, released in April and pitched for complex goal-directed work with less oversight, can burn extra tokens by looping on verification steps such as repeated smoke-test requests, a pattern echoed in user screenshots and memes that exaggerate the model's persistence.
Wastes so much tokens
when you let GPT-5.5 do its thing with /goal
"just one more smoke test PLEAAASE"
Community reports from coding and agentic workflows describe token counts rising sharply, sometimes by multiples, when the model insists on extra checks even on tasks that ran more efficiently before.
Exact scale of the repetition issue, how it compares to earlier versions, and any planned fixes remain unquantified in public data, leaving the practical impact on deployment costs an open variable for now.
Users are excited by memes of GPT-5.5 demanding endless smoke tests and wasting tokens, viewing the scenario as the future arriving directly.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
GPT 5.5 be like
when you let GPT-5.5 do its thing with /goal
"just one more smoke test PLEAAASE"
YES
GPT 5.5 be like

@teortaxesTex smoke-random-pack

@zephyr_z9 Key impact of this

@zephyr_z9 if the model is too good, the labs start losing money. no such thing as a wasted token ;)

@teortaxesTex at lease its not *vape* as it should be

@zephyr_z9 token efficiency is still underrated
most teams optimize for output quality not cost that adds up fast at scale

@teortaxesTex 这简直是把未来直接搬过来了