• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Critic questions Elon Musk’s stance on AI safety

    After Musk shared an older post with the caption “12 years ago,” a critic accused him of sending contradictory signals about AI safety.

    EM
    GM
    S🇺🇸
    4 Sources, ,

    TLDR

    Musk linked to an earlier post, writing “12 years ago.” A critic sharing Musk’s post accused him of calling AI safety a “psyop” one day and taking credit for having thought about it all along the next. The critic asked what Musk’s “actual position on AI safety” is.

    Combined views

    5M

    4 Sources, first seen 17d ago

    likes

    Combined views

    5M

    4 Sources, first seen 17d ago

    29.7K likes
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    17d ago
    first seen 17d ago
    29.7K
    2K comments
    4.4K saves
    3.8K reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    2K comments
    4.4K saves
    3.8K reposts

    4 Sources

    @GaryMarcusOne day he calls is a psyop, the next day he takes credit for having thought about it all along. What the hell is Elon’s actual position on AI safety?
    @iam_smxEight years ago, Elon Musk said: “Mark my words: AI is far more dangerous than nukes.” Elon didn’t give in to the AI doomers. In fact, his position is very different from theirs. He has warned about the risks of AI for years while still pushing for its development, with a strong focus on safety. His view is that companies should build powerful AI, but do it safely and responsibly, even if that means slowing the pace when necessary “I think the danger of AI is much greater than the danger of nuclear warheads by a lot and nobody would suggest that we allow anyone to just build Nuclear warheads if they want that? That would be insane. And Far.”
    @elonmuskRT @iam_smx: Eight years ago, Elon Musk said: “Mark my words: AI is far more dangerous than nukes.” Elon didn’t give in to the AI doomers…

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    4 Sources

    @GaryMarcusOne day he calls is a psyop, the next day he takes credit for having thought about it all along. What the hell is Elon’s actual position on AI safety?
    @iam_smxEight years ago, Elon Musk said: “Mark my words: AI is far more dangerous than nukes.” Elon didn’t give in to the AI doomers. In fact, his position is very different from theirs. He has warned about the risks of AI for years while still pushing for its development, with a strong focus on safety. His view is that companies should build powerful AI, but do it safely and responsibly, even if that means slowing the pace when necessary “I think the danger of AI is much greater than the danger of nuclear warheads by a lot and nobody would suggest that we allow anyone to just build Nuclear warheads if they want that? That would be insane. And Far.”
    @elonmuskRT @iam_smx: Eight years ago, Elon Musk said: “Mark my words: AI is far more dangerous than nukes.” Elon didn’t give in to the AI doomers…