A post says Yann’s answer is no and quotes Chris saying that view has “been proven to be wrong.”
A post frames a disagreement over whether a language model can ever understand the physical world. It says Yann’s answer is no and quotes Chris: “I think that is wrong and has been proven to be wrong.”
168.5K
6 Sources, first seen ago
Some accounts credited Yann LeCun with key foundations behind recent AI gains, while many others dismissed his skepticism on scaling LLMs to AGI or physical-world understanding as fraudulent goalpost-moving.
Based on 203 sentiment-bearing replies from 167 accounts across 4 conversations.
Some accounts credited Yann LeCun with key foundations behind recent AI gains, while many others dismissed his skepticism on scaling LLMs to AGI or physical-world understanding as fraudulent goalpost-moving.
Based on 203 sentiment-bearing replies from 167 accounts across 4 conversations.
—
Not ranked yet
—
Not ranked yet
