More attack evaluations are credited with stronger results
A post says seeing many broken defenses prompted a push for more attack evaluations, which its author credits with strengthening their results.
TLDR
The author says seeing many broken defenses, including some they found themselves, made them push for more attack evaluations. They credit that testing with stronger results, but say a cleverer attack could still emerge; they had exhausted their own ideas and budget.
Combined views
—
1 Source, first seen ago
