Positive users praise Model 5.6 for coding due to its careful thoroughness and reduced need for oversight while negative users find it underwhelming compared to 5.5 or alternatives like Fable.
Based on 24 visible X reactions from 135 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@thdxr Depends on hw you measure effort Quite a lot compared to Claude models GPT 5.6 is capable, but it is also retarded
@thdxr Yes, have stopped using opus at all. Very good model and very fast as well.
@thdxr +1 to this, it is the primary model I use for coding today, period.
@thdxr It is legit great, it’s very careful and thorough.
@thdxr 5.5 still feels better
5.6 is the most usable model ever made not saying it's gonna magically solve all your problems, it's just very easy to get good results from with low effort at this point if you're still struggling to get good code out of the machine it might be a you thing
Positive users praise Model 5.6 for coding due to its careful thoroughness and reduced need for oversight while negative users find it underwhelming compared to 5.5 or alternatives like Fable.
Based on 24 visible X reactions from 135 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.