A poster argues that keeping AI work public and progressively spreading capabilities would help harden systems.
A poster worries that if governments and major AI labs call for a slowdown, they would continue building in secret. They argue instead for keeping development public and progressively spreading capabilities to harden systems.
25.7K
8 Sources, first seen ago
—
Not ranked yet
—
Not ranked yet
@beffjezosYes this is my concern too. If govt and big labs cry for a slowdown, they will absolutely just continue building but go dark Much better to keep this building in public and progressively diffuse capabilities to harden systems
@tenderizzationhear me out: we pace the frontier by outlawing all dynamism (including fine-grained dynamic sparsity) in frontier models, with an additional clause banning muon i am prepared to rally the entire infra engineer base behind this cause
@DavidSKruegerI also worry that we don’t know -- and won’t know -- what models are capable of at the time of a pause, so whitelisting will be hard to get right. We also won’t know what ingenious ways of using these whitelisted AI systems people might come up with given a few years/decades.@beffjezosYes this is my concern too. If govt and big labs cry for a slowdown, they will absolutely just continue building but go dark Much better to keep this building in public and progressively diffuse capabilities to harden systems@tenderizzationhear me out: we pace the frontier by outlawing all dynamism (including fine-grained dynamic sparsity) in frontier models, with an additional clause banning muon i am prepared to rally the entire infra engineer base behind this cause@DavidSKruegerI also worry that we don’t know -- and won’t know -- what models are capable of at the time of a pause, so whitelisting will be hard to get right. We also won’t know what ingenious ways of using these whitelisted AI systems people might come up with given a few years/decades.@beffjezosYes this is my concern too. If govt and big labs cry for a slowdown, they will absolutely just continue building but go dark Much better to keep this building in public and progressively diffuse capabilities to harden systems@tenderizzationhear me out: we pace the frontier by outlawing all dynamism (including fine-grained dynamic sparsity) in frontier models, with an additional clause banning muon i am prepared to rally the entire infra engineer base behind this cause@DavidSKruegerI also worry that we don’t know -- and won’t know -- what models are capable of at the time of a pause, so whitelisting will be hard to get right. We also won’t know what ingenious ways of using these whitelisted AI systems people might come up with given a few years/decades.@beffjezosYes this is my concern too. If govt and big labs cry for a slowdown, they will absolutely just continue building but go dark Much better to keep this building in public and progressively diffuse capabilities to harden systems@tenderizzationhear me out: we pace the frontier by outlawing all dynamism (including fine-grained dynamic sparsity) in frontier models, with an additional clause banning muon i am prepared to rally the entire infra engineer base behind this cause@DavidSKruegerI also worry that we don’t know -- and won’t know -- what models are capable of at the time of a pause, so whitelisting will be hard to get right. We also won’t know what ingenious ways of using these whitelisted AI systems people might come up with given a few years/decades.
