Anthropic's political pressure on distillation is regulatory capture and most of the employees are blind to it under their veil of safety.
8:28 AM · Jun 27, 2026 · 25.1K Views
AI2 post-training lead Nathan Lambert accuses Anthropic of using political pressure on model distillation for regulatory capture
Story Overview
Nathan Lambert, post-training lead at AI2, claims Anthropic is leveraging political pressure on model distillation under the banner of safety to limit competition, even as the company documents API abuse by Chinese labs and urges Senate action. His June 27 post highlights how such moves could amount to regulatory capture, though he notes the broader policy path began earlier and that employee awareness of competitive angles remains unverified.
62930655043.4K
Policy Risk
Lobbying spend tracks safety messaging
Anthropic's Q1 2026 federal lobbying outlay hit $1.56M with a focus on export controls and AI standards, coinciding with its public warnings about distillation attacks. This timing invites scrutiny on whether the safety framing primarily protects US leadership or narrows the field.
Open Question
Employee blind spots stay unproven
Lambert suggests most Anthropic staff see only the safety veil, yet no internal documents or staff accounts confirm widespread unawareness. The gap leaves open whether the regulatory push reflects collective belief or calculated strategy.
Sentiment
Many users accused Anthropic of regulatory capture through AI distillation rules and called the behavior bigoted or complicit, while others defended the critic's push for open-source AI as principled and consistent.
Pos
33.8%
Neg
66.2%
44 comments with sentiment.
Cluster Engagement
Digg Deeper
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
VIEWS10.4KBOOKMARKS15LIKES356RETWEETS25REPLIES20
Nathan Lambert@natolambert
I've been getting a lot more hate than usual as I try to speak my mind about regulatory capture / unintentional attacks on open-source.
It's pretty sad, as there are few people in AI that can speak their mind (most companies say they cannot) and I know many people agree with me silently.
I also get people saying that you only say that because it supports the outcomes you want, in a weirdly derogatory way. Of course this is true, but I'm choosing to turn down meaningful wealth so I CAN fight for these values, working at non profits to speak my mind. Building a future that is more inclusive, diverse in the application of AI, and fairer for our children.
I may not always be right, but it has been clear to me for a while that more openness right now will help way more than supporting the closed causes. I continue to re-visit this and don't think everything should be open like some of the open-source absolutists.
I also don't like a lot of my comrades making fun of anthropic, calling the people there evil, etc. Those are not the case.
Trying to stay the course!
2hViews 10.4KLikes 356Bookmarks 15
Beff (e/acc)@beffjezos
If only someone tried to warn everyone that this was the case...
Nathan Lambert@natolambert
Anthropic's political pressure on distillation is regulatory capture and most of the employees are blind to it under their veil of safety.
1hViews 4KLikes 43Bookmarks 0
Nathan Lambert@natolambert
I have a lot of discussions with people who literally want open models banned. Happened in 2023. Happened in 2024. Happens today.
Nathan Lambert@natolambert
I've been getting a lot more hate than usual as I try to speak my mind about regulatory capture / unintentional attacks on open-source.
It's pretty sad, as there are few people in AI that can speak their mind (most companies say they cannot) and I know many people agree with me silently.
I also get people saying that you only say that because it supports the outcomes you want, in a weirdly derogatory way. Of course this is true, but I'm choosing to turn down meaningful wealth so I CAN fight for these values, working at non profits to speak my mind. Building a future that is more inclusive, diverse in the application of AI, and fairer for our children.
I may not always be right, but it has been clear to me for a while that more openness right now will help way more than supporting the closed causes. I continue to re-visit this and don't think everything should be open like some of the open-source absolutists.
I also don't like a lot of my comrades making fun of anthropic, calling the people there evil, etc. Those are not the case.
Trying to stay the course!
2hViews 2.1KLikes 27Bookmarks 0
Nathan Lambert@natolambert
I even think the leadership started down the path without regulation as an explicit goal, but that does not mean it's not still regulatory capture. it is.
Nathan Lambert@natolambert
Or their paycheck helped them buy into safety, is only human nature, I don't even fault them that much.
6hViews 3.2KLikes 40Bookmarks 0
Nathan Lambert@natolambert
Or their paycheck helped them buy into safety, is only human nature, I don't even fault them that much.
6hViews 585Likes 8
Xi JinPing Me@dontjinpingme
@natolambert @xlr8harder i just cant believe that frontier companies feel very okay picking up all the ip in the world to train on but then turn around and dont want other people to distill (when atleast they are paying you to distill vs you free loaded all the way)
57mViews 35Likes 2
mattparlmer 🪐 🌷@mattparlmer
@natolambert @StoicYield China is bad, but not bc they train on tokens they paid for
4hViews 65Likes 1
StoicYield@StoicYield
@natolambert I don’t understand
Are you saying any prevention of distillation is reg capture, or the specific way anthropic is doing it is
6hViews 28
Hadrian Veidt@HadrianVeidt0
@natolambert @xeophon Being anti distillation by a Cold War 2.0 adversary isn’t necessarily a regulatory capture strategy. Necessary vs sufficient. Both can be true.
5hViews 242Likes 2
velocity@govelocity_
@natolambert @AndrewCurran_ Good on you, but anthropic’s posture is a misanthropic one. The operating principle seems to be that humans are too immature to wield such power, and should be stewarded by the model—except for a chosen few. Those few, they’re the good ones.
1hViews 16Likes 1
Dec0ySquid@Dec0ySquid
@natolambert why don't you
what is this shit man
if you don't, who does?
their moms?
their parents?
Shin godzilla?
come onnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
4hViews 16
Aasim Malik@aasimmalikin
@natolambert Is it, Anthropic who has a subservient attitude or OpenAI?
5hViews 143Likes 2
kosi@kosiasuzu
@natolambert @xeophon Anthropic employees are either idiot savants or complicit.
5hViews 212Likes 1
Dec0ySquid@Dec0ySquid
@natolambert why is it notmalized to take away agency from others?
it's not normal
PLEEEASE
4hViews 5
Oleksii Kuchaiev@kuchaev
@natolambert Keep up the good work! Open source AI is here to stay.
2hViews 28Likes 2
xlr8harder@xlr8harder
@natolambert I think they mostly know this and think regulatory capture is the expedient route to "safety".
I mean, isn't it exactly what they are aiming for? What other form could it practically take?
Nathan Lambert@natolambert
Anthropic's political pressure on distillation is regulatory capture and most of the employees are blind to it under their veil of safety.
3hViews 267Likes 0Bookmarks 0
Chris 🇨🇦@llm_wizard
@natolambert Thanks for speaking up for those who can't, Nathan!
1hViews 54Likes 1
Vladislav Beliaev@vbeliaevv
@natolambert sure it benefits anthropic, but less lab-to-lab leakage means real rivalry instead of copying, and the whole field wins 🙃
4hViews 44Likes 1
Man@MsShannon112
@natolambert Wrong. The anthropic leaders are scared of china and have been for a long time. They have been consistent. They have a history of being honest unlike Altman or musk who play politics.
4hViews 124
Nathan Lambert@natolambert
@StoicYield They're not preventing distillation that much, or at least documenting it, they're running to DC with a "China Bad" banner
6hViews 38Likes 1
Load more posts