Many users praised CMU's distinctive environment and independent advising approach for enabling PhD students to thrive, while negative replies included crude insults and jealousy dismissals.
Based on 8 visible X reactions from 12 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
Edinburgh's Pasquale Minervini agreed, urging advisors to avoid micromanagement.
@rsalakhu @docmilanfar I had the chance to be advised by you for a semester while working with Emilio - to me the one meeting we used to do per week was indormation-dense and directional enough. Never felt like I was on my own, and the independence you provided was much appreciated.
@rsalakhu @docmilanfar Agreed on the CMU take. As I reflect back, it certainly was a great place to be a student - I wish I had made more of it
@rsalakhu @docmilanfar Peyman thinks other advisors give head to their students.
@rsalakhu He is jealous 😂
Lol I think Peyman @docmilanfar really likes me. I don't actually know him, but I'm deeply honored by his encyclopedic knowledge of my academic and industry career 😆. But jokes aside, my current and former students at CMU (and Toronto) are absolutely exceptional, self-directed, very independent in shaping and driving their own research agenda, and with impeccable work ethic, much like so many students at CMU. A student's success is also determined not only by their advisor, but also by the environment in which they grow. There is something genuinely special about CMU. It is a very collaborative place with an extraordinary concentration of talented, hardworking, and motivated students. Doing PhD is never easy, it is a lot of very very hard work, especially at a place like CMU. But many of these students will go on to become leaders in academia and industry, professors at top universities, founders, CEOs, and pioneers of new fields. And I will certainly continue to celebrate my students’ achievements, their scientific breakthroughs, and the impact they have on the world.
Many users praised CMU's distinctive environment and independent advising approach for enabling PhD students to thrive, while negative replies included crude insults and jealousy dismissals.
Based on 8 visible X reactions from 12 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
A few (potential) lessons: let students explore their own ideas and interests; do not micromanage unless strictly necessary; and enable them as much as possible with resources, connections, solutions to the problems they run into, etc.!