AIShould arXiv ban papers written by language models?
One post argues authors should use AI reviews to improve their writing, not have models write papers. A reply warns that banning AI-written papers would make arXiv irrelevant.
TLDR
One post floats a ban on papers written by large language models, suggesting arXiv reject submissions flagged by watermarking or similar methods. It draws a line between using models to review and improve authors’ language and having them write the papers themselves. A reply objects that the ban would “certainly make arXiv irrelevant.”
Combined views
Should arXiv ban papers written by language models?
One post argues authors should use AI reviews to improve their writing, not have models write papers. A reply warns that banning AI-written papers would make arXiv irrelevant.
TLDR
One post floats a ban on papers written by large language models, suggesting arXiv reject submissions flagged by watermarking or similar methods. It draws a line between using models to review and improve authors’ language and having them write the papers themselves. A reply objects that the ban would “certainly make arXiv irrelevant.”