• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    What’s a neutral label for people who see a significant chance of AI killing everyone?

    One participant in an exchange about AI extinction risk suggests “X-riskers” and says “safetyist” seems better than “doomer,” though still “not great.”

    MN
    1 Source, 15d ago, first seen 15d ago

    TLDR

    A user asks for a neutral label for someone who thinks there is a significant chance AI will kill everyone through superintelligence or loss of control. They say they suggested “singularist” in a piece three years earlier, but it hasn’t caught on. A reply proposes “X-riskers” and notes that “safetyist” sometimes gets used—calling it an apparent improvement over “doomer,” but “also not great.”

    Combined views

    203

    1 Source, first seen 15d ago

    Combined views

    203

    1 Source, first seen 15d ago

    8 likes
    8 likes
    1 comments

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 comments

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 Source

    @MaxNadeau_@binarybits X-riskers? I see "safetyist" get used sometimes which seems like an improvement over "doomer" but also not great.

    1 Source

    @MaxNadeau_@binarybits X-riskers? I see "safetyist" get used sometimes which seems like an improvement over "doomer" but also not great.
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet