• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI
    Reaction

    Auto-generated papers criticized for odd asides and phrasing

    A reader cites “the usual positive circle constant” instead of “pi” as an example of the papers’ strange wording.

    Bryan Cheong 🥮BC
    1 Source, 1h ago, first seen 1h ago

    TLDR

    One reader says auto-generated papers are bizarre to read, pointing to weird asides, references introduced and then abandoned, and roundabout phrases such as “the usual positive circle constant” for “pi.”

    Combined views

    13.3K

    1 Source, first seen 1h ago

    Combined views

    13.3K

    1 Source, first seen 1h ago

    365 likes
    365 likes
    13 comments
    49 saves
    13 reposts
    Featured Source
    13 comments
    49 saves
    13 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    Bryan Cheong 🥮@bryancskReading these auto-generated papers is so bizarre. They have weird asides, make a reference then abandon it, and do funny things like say "the usual positive circle constant" in place of "pi".1h

    1 Source

    Bryan Cheong 🥮@bryancskReading these auto-generated papers is so bizarre. They have weird asides, make a reference then abandon it, and do funny things like say "the usual positive circle constant" in place of "pi".1h