• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
AI

A proposal for fully open or fully closed AI evaluations

One post argues that private held-out test sets offer little signal about overall quality while allowing the same synthetic-data pipelines as open evaluations.

1 Source, 21d ago, first seen 21d ago

TLDR

One post proposes only two types of AI evaluations: fully open source so the community can audit everything, or fully closed with a one-sentence description. The author argues that private held-out sets give little signal about overall quality but still allow the same synthetic-data pipelines as open evaluations.

Combined views

—

1 Source, first seen 21d ago

— likes— comments— saves— reposts

Combined views

—

1 Source, first seen 21d ago

— likes— comments— saves— reposts

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

1 Source

Florian Brand@xeophonone of my hot takes is that there should only be two types of evals: - fully open source, so the community can audit everything - fully closed with a one sentence description private held out sets give little signal of the overall quality but allow the same synth pipes as open21d
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI

    1 Source

    Florian Brand@xeophonone of my hot takes is that there should only be two types of evals: - fully open source, so the community can audit everything - fully closed with a one sentence description private held out sets give little signal of the overall quality but allow the same synth pipes as open21d
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet