• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI
    Reaction

    Arguments against an immediate, indefinite international AI moratorium

    A reply argues proper regulation should be tried first and says a global moratorium would face steeper political hurdles.

    Seán Ó hÉigeartaighSÓ
    1 Source, 37m ago, first seen 37m ago

    TLDR

    After a post asked for the strongest counterargument, a reply objected to an immediate, indefinite international AI moratorium. The commenter argued that proper regulation had not yet been tried and that the political will and industry lobbying obstructing it would pose even greater hurdles for a moratorium. They also predicted that China would be reluctant to join and that a proposal coming from the West would draw suspicion, citing export controls as context.

    Combined views

    35

    1 Source, first seen 37m ago

    Combined views

    35

    1 Source, first seen 37m ago

    1 likes
    1 likes
    1 comments
    1 comments

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    Seán Ó hÉigeartaigh@S_OhEigeartaigh1. It's an extreme intervention to go to without having at least tried "regulate it properly" first. 2. "Regulate it properly" hasn't been tried because of a lack of political will and lobbying from the industry; it's difficult to see how the much more onerous "immediate, indefinite, international moratorium" demand is going to get over that same hurdles. 3. 'Immediate, international' requires getting China on board as a relatively close no. 2 They're not ready for such an extreme step, and a proposal of this nature - especially coming from the West - will be met with suspicion, and likely interpreted by many as another effort to undermine their technological progress given history and context (see export controls, various other things).1h

    1 Source

    Seán Ó hÉigeartaigh@S_OhEigeartaigh1. It's an extreme intervention to go to without having at least tried "regulate it properly" first. 2. "Regulate it properly" hasn't been tried because of a lack of political will and lobbying from the industry; it's difficult to see how the much more onerous "immediate, indefinite, international moratorium" demand is going to get over that same hurdles. 3. 'Immediate, international' requires getting China on board as a relatively close no. 2 They're not ready for such an extreme step, and a proposal of this nature - especially coming from the West - will be met with suspicion, and likely interpreted by many as another effort to undermine their technological progress given history and context (see export controls, various other things).1h