• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Paper Questions Actual Importance of Chain-of-Thought Steps

    Kevin Du shares COLM 2026 paper on whether judged steps in chain-of-thought are truly important.

    LR
    KD
    2 Sources, 27d ago, first seen 27d ago

    TLDR

    Kevin Du posted that chain-of-thought often looks meaningful yet reasoning steps judged important may not be. The COLM 2026 paper titled “Legibility is Not Interpretability: Comparing Judged and Actual Importance in Chain-Of-Thought Reasoning” suggests they are not necessarily so. Du is affiliated with NLP at ETH Zurich and previously Brown University. Laura Ruis, a postdoctoral researcher at MIT CSAIL, retweeted the announcement. The post includes a thread indicator but supplies no further details from the paper itself.

    Combined views

    4.7K

    2 Sources, first seen 27d ago

    Combined views

    4.7K

    2 Sources, first seen 27d ago

    39 likes
    39 likes
    1 comments
    22 saves
    10 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 comments
    22 saves
    10 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    2 Sources

    @kevdududuChain-of-thought often looks meaningful. But are reasoning steps that seem important *actually* important? Our COLM 2026 paper - “Legibility is Not Interpretability: Comparing Judged and Actual Importance in Chain-Of-Thought Reasoning” suggests: NOT necessarily ❌ 🧵
    @LauraRuisRT @kevdududu: Chain-of-thought often looks meaningful. But are reasoning steps that seem important *actually* important? Our COLM 2026 pap…

    2 Sources

    @kevdududuChain-of-thought often looks meaningful. But are reasoning steps that seem important *actually* important? Our COLM 2026 paper - “Legibility is Not Interpretability: Comparing Judged and Actual Importance in Chain-Of-Thought Reasoning” suggests: NOT necessarily ❌ 🧵
    @LauraRuisRT @kevdududu: Chain-of-thought often looks meaningful. But are reasoning steps that seem important *actually* important? Our COLM 2026 pap…