• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI
    Report

    A claimed mismatch between OpenAI's announced Navier-Stokes proof and its Lean formalization

    The paper's authors say the Lean-verified formal proof does not correspond to OpenAI's announced natural-language Navier-Stokes argument.

    David PfauDP
    Pedro DomingosPD
    2 Sources, 1h ago, first seen 1h ago

    TLDR

    In a paper submitted October 6, researchers argue that a Lean-verified formal proof does not correspond to the natural-language argument in OpenAI's announced proof of Navier-Stokes blow-up. They warn that AI translation of mathematical text into a formal language can introduce mismatches, so verifying the formal version need not validate the original argument.

    Combined views

    16.7K

    2 Sources, first seen 1h ago

    Combined views

    16.7K

    2 Sources, first seen 1h ago

    158 likes
    158 likes
    11 comments
    74 saves
    102 reposts
    Featured Source
    11 comments
    74 saves
    102 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    #1

    Today's Rank

    #1

    2 Sources

    Pedro Domingos@pmddomingosSurprise: the verified Navier-Stokes proof doesn’t match the one in the paper. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.081441h
    David Pfau@pfauRT @Quasilocal: The plot thickens. "We show that the formalised Lean proof does not correspond to the [written paper] proof of blow-up of…1h

    2 Sources

    Pedro Domingos@pmddomingosSurprise: the verified Navier-Stokes proof doesn’t match the one in the paper. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.081441h
    David Pfau@pfauRT @Quasilocal: The plot thickens. "We show that the formalised Lean proof does not correspond to the [written paper] proof of blow-up of…1h