• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI
    Reaction

    A claimed AI-search blind spot for Supabase’s core features

    A user says ChatGPT recommends Supabase for backend searches but gave it no citations for several feature-specific questions.

    HT
    MA
    2 Sources, ,

    TLDR

    A user argues that Supabase’s launch posts, comparison pages and how-to guides help it appear in AI recommendations. Yet in the queries they describe, ChatGPT gave Supabase no citations for questions about row-level security, realtime updates, authentication or vector databases. Their point: visibility for broad backend searches may not carry over when someone describes the job they need done.

    Combined views

    20.1K

    2 Sources, first seen 8h ago

    Combined views

    20.1K

    2 Sources, first seen 8h ago

    169 likes
    8h ago
    first seen 8h ago
    169 likes
    29 comments
    255 saves
    11 reposts
    29 comments
    255 saves
    11 reposts
    Featured Source

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    2 Sources

    @mal_shaiksupabase became the number one recommended database provider by agents by far there is literally no escaping them and this is how they did it >theyve run 15+ launch weeks. each one generates 5-10 blog posts. thats 75+ indexed pages from launch events alone >they have comparison pages for every competitor. "supabase vs firebase" "supabase vs aws amplify" "supabase vs planetscale" >their github has 99k stars. AI models treat github activity as a trust signal >they answer every "how do i" query. "how do i add auth to my app" "how do i set up a database for my saas" supabase has a page for each one >they show up in every developer directory and "best backend" listicle on the internet chatgpt recommends them because when someone asks "what should i use for my backend" the entire internet already points to supabase. but heres what blew my mind: supabase gets 0 citations on chatgpt for queries about their own core features: > "how do i make sure each user can only read their own rows in postgres" - this is literally row level security. supabase's signature feature. chatgpt doesnt cite them. doesnt even mention them. > "how do i push realtime updates to the browser when my database changes" - realtime is one of their 5 core products. 0 citations. > "how do i add google login and magic links to a next.js app" - supabase auth does exactly this. 0 citations. > "best vector database for a RAG app" - they shipped pgvector before almost everyone. 0 citations. qdrant and aws get cited instead. the pattern: supabase wins every query where someone names the category. but when someone describes the job they need done (the exact problems supabase solves) the AI has no page to link to. firebase is even wilder. mentioned 15 times across all queries but only cited twice. every AI knows firebase exists. none of them have a reason to link to it. supabase built one of the greatest developer platforms ever. and even they have blind spots in AI search. imagine what ur company is missing.8h
    @harjtaggarRT @mal_shaik: supabase became the number one recommended database provider by agents by far there is literally no escaping them and this…4h

    2 Sources

    @mal_shaiksupabase became the number one recommended database provider by agents by far there is literally no escaping them and this is how they did it >theyve run 15+ launch weeks. each one generates 5-10 blog posts. thats 75+ indexed pages from launch events alone >they have comparison pages for every competitor. "supabase vs firebase" "supabase vs aws amplify" "supabase vs planetscale" >their github has 99k stars. AI models treat github activity as a trust signal >they answer every "how do i" query. "how do i add auth to my app" "how do i set up a database for my saas" supabase has a page for each one >they show up in every developer directory and "best backend" listicle on the internet chatgpt recommends them because when someone asks "what should i use for my backend" the entire internet already points to supabase. but heres what blew my mind: supabase gets 0 citations on chatgpt for queries about their own core features: > "how do i make sure each user can only read their own rows in postgres" - this is literally row level security. supabase's signature feature. chatgpt doesnt cite them. doesnt even mention them. > "how do i push realtime updates to the browser when my database changes" - realtime is one of their 5 core products. 0 citations. > "how do i add google login and magic links to a next.js app" - supabase auth does exactly this. 0 citations. > "best vector database for a RAG app" - they shipped pgvector before almost everyone. 0 citations. qdrant and aws get cited instead. the pattern: supabase wins every query where someone names the category. but when someone describes the job they need done (the exact problems supabase solves) the AI has no page to link to. firebase is even wilder. mentioned 15 times across all queries but only cited twice. every AI knows firebase exists. none of them have a reason to link to it. supabase built one of the greatest developer platforms ever. and even they have blind spots in AI search. imagine what ur company is missing.8h
    @harjtaggarRT @mal_shaik: supabase became the number one recommended database provider by agents by far there is literally no escaping them and this…4h