• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
AI
Report

Claude Haiku 5.5 reportedly reaches 91% of GPT-6.1 Sol’s design-task score at 5% of its estimated cost

OpenDesignHQ says Haiku 5.5 cost less than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and finished fastest in its design-task benchmark.

2 Sources, 2h ago, first seen 2h ago

TLDR

OpenDesignHQ says its benchmark used everyday design tasks from real user requests and found Haiku 5.5 reached 91% of GPT-6.1 Sol’s score at 5% of its estimated cost. It also says Haiku cost less than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and finished fastest. Separately, a user claims scanning one smart contract for vulnerabilities costs about $1.22 and estimates that rescanning every contract in a protocol weekly costs less than one human audit hour.

Combined views

—

2 Sources, first seen 2h ago

— likes— comments— saves— reposts

Combined views

—

2 Sources, first seen 2h ago

— likes— comments— saves— reposts

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

2 Sources

OpenDesign@OpenDesignHQWe benchmarked @claudeai's Haiku 5.5 on everyday design tasks from real user requests. It reached 91% of GPT-6.1 Sol’s score at 5% of its estimated cost, while costing less than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and finishing fastest. Are open models losing their edge? Full results below ↘️2h
Edward@Defi_EdwardAnthropic put a number on something that changes the actual economics of a security audit. Scanning a single smart contract for vulnerabilities now costs about $1.22. a traditional audit runs thousands of dollars and happens once, at launch. That cost gap is the actual mechanism behind "continuous verification," not a vague industry trend. At $1.22 per scan, rescanning every contract in a protocol weekly costs less than a single human audit hour. The shielded labs researcher who found a four-year-old zcash flaw used exactly this kind of cheap, repeatable scanning, not a one-time review.1h
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI

    2 Sources

    OpenDesign@OpenDesignHQWe benchmarked @claudeai's Haiku 5.5 on everyday design tasks from real user requests. It reached 91% of GPT-6.1 Sol’s score at 5% of its estimated cost, while costing less than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and finishing fastest. Are open models losing their edge? Full results below ↘️2h
    Edward@Defi_EdwardAnthropic put a number on something that changes the actual economics of a security audit. Scanning a single smart contract for vulnerabilities now costs about $1.22. a traditional audit runs thousands of dollars and happens once, at launch. That cost gap is the actual mechanism behind "continuous verification," not a vague industry trend. At $1.22 per scan, rescanning every contract in a protocol weekly costs less than a single human audit hour. The shielded labs researcher who found a four-year-old zcash flaw used exactly this kind of cheap, repeatable scanning, not a one-time review.1h
    Today's Rank

    #19

    Today's Rank

    #19